Hi, Javier!

MX series: Full-featured – sings, dances, walks the cat, etc. But painful racking (as you noted).  Very nice and comprehensive boxes otherwise.  Interfaces are more expensive, but often modular and wider variety.

EX/QFX series: Nice switches, OK L3 routers.  Lots of limitations in MPLS and various other corner-case limitations.

 

My personal opinion:

 

My experience is that you never fill up an EX9208 or MX480 chassis, but the MX240 is too small.  YMMV.  MX480 line cards are stupid expensive compared to, well, everything else.

 

I’m probably out-of-date on some (or much) of my knowledge, let’s see what everyone else here has to say!

 

-Adam

 

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN LOGO]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
athompson@merlin.mb.ca
www.merlin.mb.ca

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+athompson=merlin.mb.ca@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Javier Gutierrez Guerra
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 3:55 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Juniper hardware recommendation

 

Hi,

Just out of curiosity, what would you recommend using for a core router/switch from Juniper?

MX208,480,10K

Datasheets show them all as very nice and powerful devices (although they do use a lot of rack space and side to side airflow is painful) but I’m just wondering here what most people use and how good or bad of an experience you have with it 😊

Thanks,

 

Javier Gutierrez Guerra

Network Analyst

CCNA R&S, JNCIA

Westman Communications Group

Phone: 204-717-2827

Email: guerraj@westmancom.com

WCG_Corp_Logo_horiz_cFullcolorHR

 

cisco-certified-network-associate-routing-and-switching-ccna-routing-and-switching