I call any upstream link 'over capacity' if either: 1) There is less than 50mb/s unused 2) The circuit is more than 50% in use I guess by my definition a DS3 is always 'over capacity' --Phil -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:36 PM To: pr@isprime.com; 'Alex Rubenstein' Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency bwahaha, 2 funnee. I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding another ds3 at that point. Bri ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr@isprime.com> To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <alex@nac.net> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency
40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
--Phil
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Alex Rubenstein Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM To: Derek Samford Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years,
and it's never been as bad as it is now.
oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).
Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss, during business hours.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
having
latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were experiencing earlier?
Derek
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --