Getting IPv6 to the masses without giving them the ability to get their IPv6 problems resolved seems not like a long-tail issue so much as a really poor choice of deployment plans. Just my $0.02. Owen
On Oct 12, 2015, at 20:17 , Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher@f5.com> wrote:
Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today Ironic.
Oh wait..
Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
:sigh:
Tech support websites are long tail
Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in high traffic use cases.
Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what you expect.
<deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me outtages>
CB