13 Jul
2011
13 Jul
'11
12:50 a.m.
On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience with the IETF mailing list. It has had ongoing issues with out-of-sequence delivery. Based on the Received headers, it's seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the AMS servers. It appears they may be trying something different with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.
ietf.org is mailman and postfix.
-Larry