please elaborate. My knowledge of IPv6 is admittedly lacking, but I always assumed that the routing tables would be much larger if the internet were to convert from IPv4 due to the sheer number of networks available. Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu 10/08/2007 06:49 PM To Keegan.Holley@sungard.com cc Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog <nanog@merit.edu>, owner-nanog@merit.edu, "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> Subject Re: How Not to Multihome Keegan.Holley@sungard.com wrote:
I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those same routers with ipv6 routes.
All 970 of them? joelja
*Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>* Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
10/08/2007 06:10 PM
To "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> cc nanog <nanog@merit.edu> Subject Re: How Not to Multihome
It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.
it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion) and vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class routers.
randy