Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?

On 9/6/23 17:27, Tom Beecher wrote:

At least on MX, what Juniper calls 'per-packet' is really 'per-flow'.

Unless you specifically configure true "per-packet" on your LAG:     set interfaces ae2 aggregated-ether-options load-balance per-packet I ran per-packet on a Juniper LAG 10 years ago. It produced 100% perfect traffic distribution. But the reordering was insane, and the applications could not tolerate it. If you applications can tolerate reordering, per-packet is fine. In the public Internet space, it seems we aren't there yet. Mark.