17 Aug
2007
17 Aug
'07
2:03 p.m.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:36:07 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy?
Because there is no "Your kloo must be this tall to ride the Internet" sign posted.