16 Sep
2012
16 Sep
'12
2:26 p.m.
On 14/09/2012 12:38, Paul Thornton wrote:
Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't in the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or question) any proposed changes?
I just posted to ap-wg about this:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-September/0071...
Nick