19 Dec
2017
19 Dec
'17
8:50 p.m.
On Dec 19, 2017, at 07:39 , Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
On 12/18/17, 2:36 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Harald Koch" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of chk@pobox.com> wrote:
They could use IPv6. I mean, if the mobile phone companies can figure it out, surely an ISP can...
Except for cases when it is impossible or impractical to update software on a great number of legacy devices…
JL
Yeah, in those cases, they should use IPv6 + NAT64 or similar mechanism. Owen