4 Apr
2000
4 Apr
'00
2:59 p.m.
On 4 Apr 00, at 0:34, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
If it's merely "PSI refuses to peer directly with Exodus", that's one thing. If PSI is also refusing packets carried by some other 3rd party that PSI and Exodus both peer with, or alternate routing is failing for some other reason, that's a lot worse.
Does anybody know definitively what the REAL story is?
Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Here's a non-confidential document which may be relevant: http://www.psinet.com/carrier-isp/transitandpeering.html Note the cost-sharing arrangement built into this peering policy. Maybe this is somehow related to the parting of ways between PSI and Exodus.