I would like to know the issues as well because we are looking to going into at least 4 of their centers. Cheers Ryan -----Original Message----- From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:rs@seastrom.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:30 AM To: Justin Horstman Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Mehmet Akcin Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange Paul is pretty clueful; I think he was asking for specifics as to what the layer 8/9 issues are at Equinix, rather than an explanation of what layer 8 and 9 means. "Fly Fast", -r Justin Horstman <justin.horstman@gorillanation.com> writes:
8 users 9 politics and policies
-----Original Message----- From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotwall@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM To: Mehmet Akcin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange
What are the layer 8-9 issues?
Drive Slow, Paul Wall
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net> wrote:
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at
their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
any of people
really love or hate it.
-shac
Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9 seem the lacking part which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seem to be the largest IX
per
https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticip an tsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they
are reliable.
mehmet