2 Apr
2001
2 Apr
'01
6:14 p.m.
From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody@zocalo.net] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:51 PM
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote: > From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad), this is straight > bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would NOT have been down for > 5 weeks.
Patrik said ISPs, not IAPs.
So, please explain to me how not being multi-homed is anything other than a bad-thing and high-risk? No, I am not including colo, because it is assumed that you know what their arrangements are before you "buy". Reputable colos are multi-homed, in spades.