On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Ravi M wrote:
http://fnews.yahoo.com/street/99/09/01/valley_990901.html
Already there are signs that Exodus' relations with some high-profile clients are in jeopardy. Service problems are serious enough that they've generated high-level
What was the point of posting this again? Every promising local ISP/colo provider has problems, since you cannot please everyone all of the time. What really matters is how _you_ are being treated and are they delivering the services they promised you when the contracts were signed. This sort of fruitless bitching pretty much serves no useful purpose. Content: I keep hearing about schemes like FastPath (tm, pat pending) and ASAP (tm) because apparently the BGP path selection is inadequate. Could someone actually give some concrete examples or should I just chalk it up to rumors since operationally, BGP couldn't be worse. /vijay