On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 05:59:59PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
It's a loosing battle, and a failed system. Don't blame the purchaser, it's a lack of oversight on the part of who ever does the blacklisting.
You bought damaged goods which aren't fit for the purpose you have in mind. If you had performed due diligence research before finalizing the purchase, perhaps you would have chosen not to do so. If the seller had done their due diligence research, perhaps they could have more accurately described what they were selling to you. There's certainly a lack of "oversight" here, but it's not on the part of the various blacklists which have *correctly* noted the dubious history of the allocation in question. And which, I might add, are not in possession of proof that it doesn't still belong to the same people who generated that dubious history. In other words, everything said here thus far might be precisely the truth, or it might be the 14,273th iteration of a ruse designed to get the block unlisted so that it can be once again utilized for abuse. ---rsk