Exactly Mike! The Idea would be to define some base levels, to make the creations of route-filtering simpler to everyone in the world. And what comes beyond that, is in charge of each autonomous system. It would make the scripting and templates easier and would avoid fat-fingers. Em ter., 8 de set. de 2020 às 15:35, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> escreveu:
How I see the OP's intent is to create a BCP of what defined communities have what effect instead of everyone just making up whatever they draw out of a hat, simplifying this process for everyone.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
------------------------------ *From: *"Tom Beecher via NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> *To: *"Douglas Fischer" <fischerdouglas@gmail.com> *Cc: *"NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:30:19 PM *Subject: *Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'
BGP Large Communities ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8195 ) already provides for anyone to define the exact handling you wish.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:57 AM Douglas Fischer via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
Most of us have already used some BGP community policy to no-export some routes to some where.
On the majority of IXPs, and most of the Transit Providers, the very common community tell to route-servers and routers "Please do no-export these routes to that ASN" is:
-> 0:<TargetASN>
So we could say that this is a de-facto standard.
But the Policy equivalent to "Please, export these routes only to that ASN" is very varied on all the IXPs or Transit Providers.
With that said, now comes some questions:
1 - Beyond being a de-facto standard, there is any RFC, Public Policy, or something like that, that would define 0:<TargetASN> as "no-export-to" standard?
2 - What about reserving some 16-bits ASN to use <ExpOnlyTo>:<TargetASN> as "export-only-to" standard? 2.1 - Is important to be 16 bits, because with (RT) extended communities, any ASN on the planet could be the target of that policy. 2.2 - Would be interesting some mnemonic number like 1000 / 10000 or so.
-- Douglas Fernando Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação
-- Douglas Fernando Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação