27 208.63.128.3 (208.63.128.3) 111.475 ms 69.670 ms 69.267 ms 28 208.63.128.1 (208.63.128.1) 68.883 ms 67.147 ms 72.106 ms 29 208.63.128.3 (208.63.128.3) 69.842 ms 67.889 ms 66.944 ms 30 208.63.128.1 (208.63.128.1) 70.986 ms 73.124 ms 68.452 ms
This looks exactly like a routing loop to me. Why do you think it is not a routing loop?
I was assuming that any routing loop in the system would be transient, but this one is not (the traceroute is still showing the same behavior). The extent to which I see this also makes me think that there is something else going on. Do you think that it can be a real persistent routing loop (data packets would actually shuttle between the two interfaces) as against some wierdness because of traceroute? thanks, -- ratul