18 Apr
2005
18 Apr
'05
5:26 p.m.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Andy Johnson wrote:
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
What possible technical issue could exist that to don't have to wire the dslam to a pots splitter?
Actually, even if they did wire it to a pots splitter, and there was no pots line present, it'd still work.
My speculation is that their billing/accounting system is based on a POTs number, and since these customers will not need one, they will have administrative errors managing accounts.
that'd be unfortunate, what with number portability and all, yes?