Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?

In message <Pine.BSD.3.91.950419000916.9764A-100000@muffin.wis.com>, "Michael F . Nittmann" writes:

Maybe we should make participation at a meet point subject to filing data to the route server, and peering should only go via route servers.

I'd settle for must register routes, although the latter would enforce the requirement. It seems to me to be very politically infeasible, so not really worth further discussion.

flames?

Be carefull. Bill might hug you. :-) Not really a flame, but what you said was not really off the wall either, so none required. :-)

Mike

Curtis