On 5/12/14, 10:07 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> wrote:
On May 12, 2014, at 6:02 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
On 10/05/2014 22:34, Randy Bush wrote:
imiho think vi hart has it down simply and understandable by a lay person. <http://vihart.com/net-neutrality-in-the-us-now-what/>. my friends in last mile providers disagree. i take that as a good sign.
Vi's analogy is wrong on a subtle but important point. In the analogy, the delivery company needs to get a bunch of new trucks to handle the delivery but as the customer is paying for each delivery instances, the delivery company's costs are covered by increased end-user charges.
Two words nuke your suggestion here: Amazon Prime
Amazon Prime isn’t a flat-rate delivery service for the delivery company, else it’d be called FedUPS Prime. It’s a flat rate shipping subscription for *Amazon*, and is likely a loss leader to ensure better stickiness of Amazon’s potential customers. They may have a great deal of negotiating leverage on their delivery partners to reduce their shipping costs, and the sheer volume of Amazon warehouses mean that they can take advantage of proximity to reduce costs further (like a CDN), but I haven’t seen anything implying that they’ve been successful in negotiating a contract that is insensitive to the *amount* of items being shipped. Wes George This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.