On 2020-05-03 01:10, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
There is a woman torturing animals on Omegle, she is advertising it on her Instagram account. Need to get this in front of the right people to have her traced and shut down.
Please let me know if you can provide a contact for either org.
Anne
--- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School Advisor, Colorado Innovation Response Team Task Force CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification Policy Drafting and Review for Businesses Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant, GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) Location: Boulder, Colorado
Many times I came across the fact that large content operators do not have adequate support. I understand that increasing the support is not reasonable, its too expensive. Why they don't make a separate "route" with payment and a list of urgent complaints criteria, where the complainant pays a deposit of say $ 100-$200/hr, and if he writes nonsense or not urgent case, qualified for free support, he simply loses money and pays the operator for the time spent. If case qualifies for urgent support, the money is returned to person seeking support. But how things are going on now, it is totally wrong. Large content networks are turning into trash bin and a hotbed of crime due to the inability to quickly control illegal content. I wouldn’t refuse such $100 option for ISP, if someone wants to send me complaints about torrents for $100, i don’t mind looking at it carefully for compliance with local law. And at the same time I could respond more quickly to complaints on DDOS and SPAM, hire dedicated staff, its for good too. Also he can handle additionally regular abuse complaints channels.