On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Jeff Shultz wrote:
I'm having fun figuring out how altering BIND (since I assume that is the basis of their arguements) rises to the level of conspiracy... IANAL, obviously.
I read you loud and clear. I believe most rational people among us do, see below. .... <sarcasm> Oh my, a vendor that actually listens to the cryout of its customers. That cannot be tolerated. </sarcasm> This, in my own humble opinion, climbs slowly but surely to the levels of being ridiculous. Paul did exactly what any good vendor would do. If many customers or users asked for a feature, the vendor would issue the feature. It is the administrators choice to use the feature. As such, it is not the vendors fault in any way. After the courts drop this one as well, I am curious what will be the next Verisign idea. They (read: their lawyers) have proved themselves to be full of bright ideas (that lead to a dead end due to irrationality), and I am curious to see what's next. happy sailing, --Ariel
** Reply to message from Bob Martin <bob@buckhorn.net> on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:54:20 -0500
Anything I/we can do to help the cause?
Bob Martin
Quoted from different thread:
(note that verisign has amended their complaint against icann (since the court dismissed the first one) and i'm now named as a co-conspirator.if you reply to this message, there's a good chance of your e-mail appearing in court filings at some point.) -- Paul Vixie
-- Jeff Shultz A railfan pulls up to a RR crossing hoping that there will be a train.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
-- Ariel Biener e-mail: ariel@post.tau.ac.il PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/pgp.html +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System at the Tel-Aviv University CC.