On 4/8/2005 6:19 PM, just me wrote:
I don't really want to speak for anyone else here, but it always appeared to me that the problem Vix keeps mentioning is queries with 1918 SOURCE ADDRESSES, not 1918-space queries.
This thread, like every nanog thread, has completely lost focus of the original issue, and devolved into some brain-damaged solution to an imagined problem.
I don't think it's a bad question. We just went through a similar talk in the zetroconf wg about local addresses. Besides, the question wasn't Paul's in the first place. | From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com> | To: nanog@merit.edu | Subject: The power of default configurations | Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504061756550.5174@clifden.donelan.com> | | On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Paul Vixie wrote: | > adding more. oh and as long as you're considering whether to | > restrict things to your LAN/campus/ISP, i'm ready to see rfc1918 | > filters deployed... | | Why does BIND forward lookups for RFC1918 addresses by default? Sorry we are bothering you are mail spool. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/