On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
but
actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few.
Most vendors took out hardware multicast support and do it via recirculation these days.
I'm more interested in other topics, this would likely be served by a CDN, and I'm curious if any CDNs have started placing gear behind CGN/LSN.
CDNs have shown hesitation to receiving traffic from non-unique ipv4 space despite the obvious benefits of CGN bypass. Cb
I've also noticed some hotels and other 'guest net' folks capturing 4.2.2.1 and comparable open recursive name servers in-house. Two weeks ago I could ping 4.2.2.1 and get responses when TTL was set to 1 on my outgoing packets.
- Jared