It is my understanding that ISPs block IP addresses and domains under court order now for copyright violations, criminal activity which would include CP. They require a court order as they cannot ascertain if it is CP or not, that is a Law Enforcement decision. The US Supreme Court decision's was just being nude is not lewd, also with aging software which can regress photos, LEOs in the US have to ascertain if this is CP or photo shopped.
...and you will see the TOR exit nodes instead of crime home IP if
censorship is implemented.
11.12.18 19:35, Aaron1 пише:
> ... The only thing I can think of is the idea that I’ve heard before is
> the way to catch someone is to watch them well they are accessing, the
> concept of honeypots comes to mind
>
> Aaron
>
> On Dec 11, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Larry Allen <mrallen1971@gmail.com
> <mailto:mrallen1971@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I can't imagine a single rational argument against this.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 10:56 William Anderson <neuro@well.com
>> <mailto:neuro@well.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 06:08, Lotia, Pratik M
>> <Pratik.Lotia@charter.com <mailto:Pratik.Lotia@charter.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on
>> whether an ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child
>> pornography exploitation) content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’
>> list which contains such domains and it wants ISPs to block it.
>>
>>
>> This already happens in the UK, and has done for years.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abuse_image_content_list
>>
>>
>> -n
>>