28 Apr
2010
28 Apr
'10
6:07 p.m.
In message <01F57362-8092-48CB-8336-15B9CC1713C2@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part = of the v6 internet=20
Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to = renumber?
We have that ability already. Doesn't require NAT.
Regards, -drc -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org