On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
You could ask that they withdraw the prefixes and see if that works?
whois 46.96.0.0 inetnum: 46.96.0.0 - 46.96.39.255 netname: LINKTEL-MAN-ETHERNET-EXTENSION Updated: 2011-03-15 ************* e-mail: noc@link-telecom.net whois link-telecom.net Domain Name: LINK-TELECOM.NET Creation Date: 16-aug-2011 ************* Would YOU filter announcements from YOUR customer based solely on an email request from noc@link-telecom.net? The Spamhaus reports appear credible, as does the RIPE registration issue with those prefixes. If I was InterNAP, I think I'd challenge my customer about them. Start of business Monday morning. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004