1 May
2002
1 May
'02
10:51 a.m.
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:13:11 PDT, kevin graham said:
Given the bellowing over some of the allocations in 24/8 that have been heard here before, it would seem to be welcome. Sticking large numbers of unadministered, always-on boxes that aren't supposed to be running inbound services in unrouted space would save all of us headaches.
That's almost a better justification for NAT than address-space conservation. ;)