Hah! On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Warren Bailey < wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
The United States Constitution*
*See Terms and Conditions for details, not all citizens apply, void where prohibited, subject to change at any time.
On 6/21/13 11:42 AM, "Phil Fagan" <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess the moral here is....don't do anything "wrong."
:-D
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote:
I would think this is only an issue if they throw out the Fourth in
they use that data collected "inadvertantly" to build a case a against you they use no other data collected under a proper warrant.
That statement ignores a longstanding legal principle known as "fruit of
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote: that when the poison tree".
Howdy,
In spite of what you may have seen on TV, law enforcement is not required to ignore evidence of a crime which turns up during a lawful search merely because it's evidence of a different crime. Fruit of the poisonous tree applies when the original search for whatever it was they were originally looking for is unlawful. Supposedly the FISA court found the NSA's troll for terrorists to be lawful. Once that's true, evidence of any crime may be lawfully introduced in court.
For a fun read, check out the Ilustrated Guide to Criminal Law: http://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=18
Regards, Bill Herrin
-- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
-- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
-- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618