On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:48 AM, <michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote:
The whole address conservation mantra has turned out to be a lot of smoke and mirrors anyway.
At the time, yes, this particular issue was overhyped, just as the routing-table-expansion issue was underhyped. As we move to an 'Internet of Things', however, it will become manifestl With regards to the perceived advantages and disadvantages of IPv6 as it is currently defined, there is wide range of opinion on the subject. For many, the 'still-need-NAT-under-IPv6 vs. IPv6- eliminates-the-need-for-NAT' debate is of minor importance compared to more fundamental questions. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> // 408.527.6376 voice Technology is legislation. -- Karl Schroeder