On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete...
---------------------------------------- Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6 faster/better proof?" thread I can't reply to. I still can't. All I wanted to say was: --- cb.list6@gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> I hear transit is dead https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/ -------------------------------------------- Funny that he also seems to take indirect aim at IPv6: "In this case, then in such a collection of service cones, is there any residual value in a globally consistent address space? If all the traffic flows are constrained to sit within each service cone, then the residual addressing requirement is at best a requirement to uniquely distinguish end points just within the scope of the cone without any particular requirement for network-wide uniqueness " That seems to point to John Day's architecture; RINA: https://www.slideshare.net/ictpristine/rina-introduction-part-i scott