20 Mar
2021
20 Mar
'21
4:41 p.m.
Agreed. Don't fix what isn't broken. -----Original Message----- From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote:
i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic. in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not need to fix that.
Simple. As. That. Mark.