Seems way easier than literally everything else being proposed to me, am I missing something? -LB Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO ben@6by7.net "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks> FCC License KJ6FJJ
On Feb 9, 2022, at 12:15 PM, Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let the world ping the brains out of it?
Seems like a lot of overhead for zero benefit.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:11 PM Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe <lb@6by7.net <mailto:lb@6by7.net>> wrote: ok that’s amazing.
RFC1149 amazing.
Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let the world ping the brains out of it?
Who owns 69.69.69.69 - collab?
How naff is this?
-LB
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO ben@6by7.net <mailto:ben@6by7.net> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks>
FCC License KJ6FJJ
On Feb 9, 2022, at 9:38 AM, Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net <mailto:jay@west.net>> wrote:
On 2/8/22 23:42, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
The only problem is the less friendly IP address (although this will be less and less a problem with IPv6, since 2001:4860:4860::8888 is not really friendly).
Fun fact: Someone at Sprint had the same hobby as I did in the early 1970s. Their website resolves to 2600:: which I think is rather friendly. :-)
Please don't use it for an IPv6 ping target, thanks.
-- Jay Hennigan - jay@west.net <mailto:jay@west.net> Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV