Yeah, most people ignore ZH. UBNT marketing hyped it up quite a bit, and for a residential deployment it can work OK, but if you have any kind of background in wireless you'll understand that it goes out the window for a non-trivial deployment due to the requirement of all APs sharing a channel. It's too bad they don't support 802.11r (fast roaming) and 802.11k (radio resource management). On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
What problems have you had with UBNT?
It's zero hand-off doesn't work on unsecured networks, but that's about the extent of the issues I've heard of other than stadium density environments.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manuel Marín" <mmg@transtelco.net> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06:39 PM Subject: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Dear nanog community
I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs that you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend recommended me Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience with Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience with ubiquity for this type of requirement was not that good.
Thank you and have a great day
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net