Ronald, You don’t have to jump into such a defensive position to my comment. I am neither siding with Mr. Cohen on this case nor with your side, I am merely a neutral third sharing his thoughts.
Meanwhile, if I am right and if Mr. Cohen is wrong, then what price will he pay for his misdeeds, and who will see to it that he receives the justice due him?
Inevitably, he will lose access to the resources mentioned shall it turn out you are right on this case, whilst this does not impose any further consequences in itself, you at least achieved a re-establishment of ordinariness, which, given this is an open discussion on a public mailing list, should be priority #1. I will be honest with you here, you could have brought the point(s) you are making across in a different fashion, which does not even give the accused party any opportunities to sue for libel or slander. Given that you are right on this case, this ultimately should not matter, however, shall it turn out you are wrong, or your point is deemed to be invalid (by whoever), you might not have a joker left to pull. Ultimately to cut a lot of words short, you might have more success in this case by sticking closely to obvious or proven facts which they can not subsequently declare as libel. I do not comment on this because I am against your desire to have a clear overview of what actually goes on here, I am also not commenting to have fun or mess with either of you, I am merely objecting the way of communication that happens at this stage.
On 19.09.2019, at 13:03, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
In message <8A49BF73-7A68-4B8F-9DC5-E94B7FE637F2@globalone.io>, Florian Brandstetter <florianb@globalone.io> wrote:
... this is certainly not a place where you can slander his name or anyone associated with him in any manner for the entertainment of everyone...
If I have slandered anyone, then I shall bear the price for that, in accordance with law. I have accepted that risk, in order to say what I have said, and I have done so from within the most litigious nation on earth.
Meanwhile, if I am right and if Mr. Cohen is wrong, then what price will he pay for his misdeeds, and who will see to it that he receives the justice due him?
Mr. Cohen sits with impunity in Israel, and by remote control appears to request his California lawyer, the colorful and storied Mr. Bennett Kelley, to file suit against me, even as Mr. Cohen takes IPv4 space away from legitimate businesses and governmental entities in South Africa, Australia, and Japan, also by remote control, and also with the relative impunity afforded him by his sheer distance from these places. I have risked my neck, my reputation, and my entire bank account in order to call him out, and if you think that I have done so lightly or without evidence you are wrong. Meanwhile, what has Mr. Cohen risked? And who will see to it that he pays an appropriate price, in Israel, if I am right and he is wrong?
Regards, rfg