27 Dec
2008
27 Dec
'08
3:37 p.m.
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, devang patel wrote:
Thanks for pointing out other good part of having CLNS as a transport for ISIS as a security point!
It's also a potential hassle, where you can have IS-IS up and running, but have IP completely hosed. With OSPF this is harder as it actually runs over IP; no IP, no IGP adjacancy. There is good reason why neither OSPF nor IS-IS rules the IGP world, they both have their advantages and disadvantages. Differences are usually in what the organisation is used to, not because one is fundamentally better than the other. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se