15 May
2003
15 May
'03
9:39 p.m.
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Chris Woodfield wrote:
The flip side is the realization that professional spamming is lucrative enough that at least for one person, it was worth the risk of breaking the law in order to keep it up.
Don't know about that, he couldn't make the $20K bail... Charles
-C
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:14:19PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
this exemplifies the corporate and legislative attempt to confuse spam == uce with forgery. if they can make the latter the issue, this leaves the way completely clear for unsolicited commercial email from the corporate sector which now fills our post boxes with ground trees.
randy