-----Original Message----- From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo [mailto:carlosm3011@gmail.com] Sent: 09 September 2011 05:10 To: Mike Jones Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
When you need to pile up this amount of trickery to make something work, it's probably high time for letting the thing die :-)
Warm regards
Carlos
You could say the same thing about NAT44 from the very start! IPv4 just needs to die sooner rather than later. For now though, there is a good many years of trickery left ;-) -- Leigh Porter ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________