For us, it was annoying - we look for prefix hijackings or what appear to be. In this case it was a false alarm but one that consumed NOC resources to troubleshoot and resolve... later to find out it was an "academic test" and nothing was really going on. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Christian Koch [mailto:christian@broknrobot.com] Sent: January 12, 2009 5:34 PM To: NANOG list Subject: Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24 <snip>
] part of the experiment is to measure the difference between the
amount
] of nanog mail lorenzo drew in 2005 by pre-announcing with the amount we ] get in 2009 while not pre-announcing. :)
This statement is an admission that he set out to annoy people, annoy them enough they would complain on a public mailing list. More over, I can't see how any researcher could use "the amount of nanog mail" as a valid indicator of anything. It has as much to do with how many engineers are bored on a given day as it does with the severity of the problem.
So the goal of this research seemed to be to see how many people the researchers could panic, and then see how 10,000 people reacted to the panic. Sounds a lot like yelling "fire" in a crowded movie house just to "research" what the results might be, and then measuring success by the number of words in the article on the front page of the paper, or perhaps the number of people trampled to death, or both.
maybe not so much annoy people, rather see how many people actually noticed the announcements and were aware that their AS was being used as an origin in the path ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."