30 Apr
2014
30 Apr
'14
1:13 a.m.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu> wrote:
On 4/29/2014 2:06 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
If everyone who had 30+ inaggregable IPv4 prefixes replaced them with 1 (or even 3) IPv6 prefixes…
As a bonus, we could get rid of NAT, too. ;-)
/me ducks (but you know I had to say it)
Yeah, just when we thought Slammer / Blaster / Nachi / Welchia / etc / etc had been eliminated by process of "can't get there from here"... we expose millions more endpoints...
/me ducks too (but you know *I* had to say it)
Pretending that endpoints are not exposed to those things with NAT is kind of like putting a screen door in front of a bank vault and saying “now safe from tornadoes”. Owen