On Mon 2016-May-30 11:45:11 +1000, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=SpjMbeWFRt4OOphw@mail.gmail.com> , Baldur Norddahl writes:
Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would be unstable.
This is not anycast NAT64. It is anycast DNS64 with the well known 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box.
While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need to be critised for faults that don't exist with it.
Pretty sure this was in response to:
Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
...so specifically regarding the idea of a public, anycast NAT64 service, rather than the public DNS64 service Google is doing.
Mark
-- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
Sorry time to get to sleep.
Regards
Baldur Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>:
Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service. Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack@gmail.com>:
For the record:
Tim,
I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread:
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
but I figured I'd let you know that:
https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use.
Regards, -Erik
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
-- Tim:>
-- Tim:>
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org