On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Alex Rubenstein wrote: ==>They won't give us an answer, but when I said I was from Net Access, he ==>said "nac.net?" like he knew me, and they were vague. They also claimed ==>that they had 'turned thier router off', but the routes were still in for ==>almost 25 minutes later. Not only that, it seemed mailcious to me, because ==>the only announced the /24 of our name servers (207.99.0.0/24) and not our ==>whole /17. They announced the first classful block from all CIDRs in the table. For example, if I had 172.16.0.0/14, 172.16.0.0/16 would have been announced. I venture to take a guess that it's something nasty with redistribution of BGP into a classful IGP and back into BGP again, but since it's not my network, I can't tell you what happened. /cah