26 Aug
2015
26 Aug
'15
3:23 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6 (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on ...).
So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;)
Facebook says IPv6 is 20-40% faster http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-lo... Another way to look at it, IPv4 is 20-40% slower than IPv6.