On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 20:57 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
zero interoperability, and no viable migration paths, it's a Forklift Upgrade(tm).
You say that with such confidence! Doesn't make it true.
Zero interoperability is technically true. However the two protocols can live very happily side by side, NOT interfering with each other. Ricky saying "zero interoperability" is technically true - but not really relevant. As to "no viable upgrade paths" you seem to be a good example of NOT that. Did you replace all your equipment in one great and costly spasm to achieve IPv6 delivery to customers? Getting IPv6 up and running is not a simple thing, but nor is it leaking-blood-from-the ears territory. "It's a forklift upgrade! There are no viable upgrade paths! Zero interoperability!" - this is just Chicken Little stuff. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: E00D 64ED 9C6A 8605 21E0 0ED0 EE64 2BEE CBCB C38B Old fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4