22 Jul
2003
22 Jul
'03
9:40 a.m.
* adamm@sihope.com (Adam Maloney) [Tue 22 Jul 2003, 15:33 CEST]:
The next worm taking advantage of the latest Windows' vulnerabilities is more or less inevitable. Someone somewhere has to be writing it. So why not include the cisco exploit in the worm payload?
Why would a worm disable a vital component on its path to new infections? -- Niels.