(Are we doing all the hard work for the smurfers, namely creating a consolidated list of all of the known smurf amplifiers?)
Of course. But that's the fastest way to bring this to an end. Dirk On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Tim Salo wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:31:28 -0500 (CDT) From: tim@alpha.net Subject: Re: SMURF AMPLIFIER BLOCK LIST -- VERY LARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To: nanog@merit.edu
It'd be nice if there were a more organized effort to collect these addresses, but for the time being, here's my list. I've actually got a bunch more, but these are hand-picked for having a large amplification factor and also for not appearing on the mcs.net page.
194.47.135 194.47.136 164.156.26 204.30.35 204.199.101
It would be interesting to see if the use of these networks as smurf aplifiers increases once they are published on nanog.
(Are we doing all the hard work for the smurfers, namely creating a consolidated list of all of the known smurf amplifiers?)
-tjs
It doesn't do 'em a damn bit of good if we all also block 'em at our entrances.
-- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost