On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 09:04:03 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
All I see there is some handwaving about separating something from something else, without even a description of why it was better than what was available when you wrote the draft.
Read the first three paragraphs of abstract of the draft:
And it doesn't actually explain why it's better. It says it's different, but doesn't give reasons to do it other than "it's different".
Read the title of the draft. The draft is not intended to describe protocol details.
In other words, you have a wish list, not a workable idea.
Try attaching an actual protocol specification
Read the title of the draft.
The Architecture of End to End Multihoming However, the draft is lacking in any description of an actual architecture. Read RFC1518, which *does* describe an architecture, and ask yourself what's in that RFC that isn't in your draft.