On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:48:52 -0600 Tom Ammon <tom.ammon@utah.edu> wrote:
RFC1918 is a good place to start ;)
Most of the issues in "Deprecating Site Local Addresses" http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3879.txt identified in IPv6 Site-Local addressing also apply to duplicated/overlapping IPv4 addressing.
On 3/18/2010 10:22 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote:
Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this. I acknowledge I'm playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump to the conclusion that this range was private. I made that assumption originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S
It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about this, and/or provide evidence to my client?
Thanks,
Jaren
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Ammon Network Engineer Office: 801.587.0976 Mobile: 801.674.9273
Center for High Performance Computing University of Utah http://www.chpc.utah.edu