4 Sep
2012
4 Sep
'12
11:45 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
While ISPs in the future should use not IPv6 but NAT with fixed IP addresses and sets of port numbers assigned to their customers, keeping the end to end transparency, it does not solve the problem of blocked port 25.
Note that IPv6 do not solve the problem of blocked port 25, either.
So - now with ipv6 you're going to see "hi, my toto highly computerized toilet is trying to make outbound port 25 connections to gmail" http://www.telecoms.com/48734/vodafone-and-ibm-team-up-on-connected-home-app... -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)