I think the implication is that, on Cogent, there isn't. :) On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 14:00 Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote:
Define "good" vs. "bad" transport of bits. As long as there is adequate bandwidth and low latency, who cares?
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:30:37PM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
That will have the effect of prioritizing Cogent routes as that would be more specific than the default routes from the other providers. Cogent are not that good that you would want to do that.
Den 2. mar. 2017 20.16 skrev "Jeff Waddell" < jeff+nanog@waddellsolutions.com
:
Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes they don't have
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> wrote:
On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote:
Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them...
Why did you don’t ask for a full view? With that, you can easily deal with that kind of problem.