Discussed, Disgusted, and Dismissed. The E space would take more software upgrades to existing systems than just deploying IPv6. Owen On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Jeremy wrote:
Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix* the problem here)
-Jeremy
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com> wrote:
IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 - 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride.
There is some hope more IPv4 organizations will start thinking about their plans for establishing connectivity with IPv6; so they can commmunicate with IPv6-only hosts that will begin to emerge later.
What organizations (eye networks) will do is layer NAT till the cows come home for some years to come. Buckle up!
-Jack Carrozzo